MALAYSIAN millennials want more money. The generation that has seen their wages stay stagnant since 2007 and are working two jobs to save for that house they probably could not afford, could do with a little more dosh in their bank account.
So what better way to spend this Friday evening than to watch the televised Budget 2018 speech, where the Prime Minister will give a macroeconomic proposal of what the government plans to do financially with taxpayer’s (read: our) money?
After all, like these billionaires know, to make money, you first have to know the system it exists in.
The unfortunate thing, however, is that the speech is usually riddled in finance-speak along the lines of so-and-so tax rates on chargeable income starting from X ringgit will go down Y percent effective from year of assessment Z.
Or it will be couched in vague terms that say nothing – what does a budget that is “inclusive” and “holistic” actually mean?
To help us decipher all these, I spoke to several economists on what Malaysian millennials should know to understand this Friday’s speech better. Here’s what they had to say:
The six percent rate will likely stay, so the predictions go. As consumers, we can celebrate this bit of good news, according to Poon Wai Ching, an associate professor at Monash University, Malaysia. But there’s a caveat: The consumption tax scope may be expanded to cover e-commerce transactions.
“If this happens, the Bottom 40 (B40), youth, the urban poor, and marginalised groups are likely to be affected,” Poon told Asian Correspondent.
Khazanah Research shows most poor Malaysians can not afford healthy diet. Healthy diet for HH of 5 cost up to RM35 per day. pic.twitter.com/QRxtKKDWM2
— G (@gaj_2) October 24, 2017
If you’re part of this group that spends most of their income on food and basic services (40 percent), this also means you’re paying higher taxes in tax-to-income ratio compared to your richer peers, who currently get more tax breaks – say hello to more income inequality.
Calling the current tax system “regressive”, chief economist at DM Analytics Muhammed Abdul Khalid said: “If you are poor you pay more, if you are rich, we love you so you don’t pay tax … Over here if you are a wage-earner you pay tax. But if you’re a capital earner, you make money from shares, zero. You don’t pay capital gains tax, nothing.”
Any cuts will mean lesser likelihood for your professors to be retained or for research to be able to be carried out in your universities. Note that public universities spending was already axed by close to 20 percent last year – their combined operating budgets were slashed by RM1.5 billion.
There are bigger implications to such cuts as well, according to former assistant secretary-general for economic development at the United Nations, Jomo Kwame Sundaram.
Given the economic reality the Malaysians currently live in, such as having the highest household debt in Asia, Jomo says Malaysians incurring higher debt to fund their education will not bode well for them.
“We have a situation in Malaysia right now where, for example, the savings of an EPF member are such that more than 80 percent will not have enough to generate an income above the poverty line after retirement,” Jomo said.
Describing it as “seriously unaffordable”, Muhammed says houses are just way too expensive, regardless of how much access you have to financing (Bank Negara Malaysia says loan approvals for key cities are close to 70 percent).
“Only 20 percent of newly launched house are below RM250,000, the rest are beyond RM250,000, which is clearly beyond the reach of many millennials. Unless of course, daddy helps,” Khalid explained.
As this Malay Mail Online article describes it, the entire housing system is “skewed” to keep house prices high and developers rich.
So, if you’re planning to buy a house, you’ll want to hear a real radical approach to keep the costs of houses down this Friday, though the chances will be pretty low.
What’s likelier, though, is an attempt to streamline all affordable housing policies through one cohesive government agency. What’s happening now is that affordable housing is left to market forces, according to Poon, and this hasn’t exactly produced enough houses for those who want them.
Programmes for this include Perumahan Rakyat 1Malaysia (PR1MA), build-to-rent urban homes for youths, MyBeautiful New Home, People’s Friendly Home (PMR) and People’s Housing Programme (PPR) – way too many agencies making it difficult to come up with genuine solutions.
“The idea of establishing a single entity entirely focused on affordable housing could be the way forward to alleviate the mismatch between affordable housing demand and supply,” Poon explained.
Many have been calling for the return of petrol subsidies – after all, this was one of the reason why those mamak prices shot up after they announced the subsidy removal.
But is this the way to go? Dr Yeah Kim Leng of Sunway University disagrees:
“It is not advisable to bring back subsidies to reduce fuel costs except to mitigate sharp temporary surges or fluctuations in prices. High prices signal a need to reduce consumption and an opportunity for the government to accelerate a shift towards public transportation, greater focus on energy efficiency and conservation and use of renewable energy.”
Does this mean we will still be stuck with having to spend a big bulk of our pay on increasingly expensive food?
Yeah said there are other forms of subsidies that can be proposed to help alleviate these costs.
“Millennial-oriented subsidies can be designed to promote healthy and meritorious activities such as sports, learning and skills development, entrepreneurial, social and creative arts and culture.”