BMF scandal ‘extended’ into Malaysian ex-PM Mahathir’s govt – CIA files
Share this on

BMF scandal ‘extended’ into Malaysian ex-PM Mahathir’s govt – CIA files

RECENTLY declassified documents by America’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) said the Malaysian government under longest-ruling Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad had a hand in the largest financial scandal the country had seen during the 1980s.

The CIA’s claim was revealed last week after its move to declassify more than 13 million documents, making them accessible online for public viewing.

During the first few years of Dr Mahathir’s tenure, Malaysia was ensnared in a massive graft debacle involving government-owned Bank Bumiputera (Bank Bumi), whose reputation was tarnished by the “questionable” operations of its wholly-owned Hong Kong subsidiary Bumiputera Malaysia Finance Ltd. (B.M.F.).

Widely known as the BMF scandal, the Malaysian bank and its offshore subsidiary dished out billions in bad loans to numerous Hong Kong property speculators, including the Carrian Investment Limited (Carrian Group) between 1979 and 1983. The scandal also saw the brutal murder of a young Malaysian Bank Bumi auditor.

SEE ALSO: Malaysia: Ex-PM Dr Mahathir appears in protest shirt, urges public to join mass rally

The BMF scandal has been described as an embarrassing episode in Dr Mahathir’s premiership, which dogged his leadership and saw hundreds of millions of dollars disappear into thin air following the defunct Carrian group and its former chief executive George Tan’s move to declare bankruptcy.

As BMF was heavily involved in providing loans to property speculators during Hong Kong’s property boom in the late ’70s, the CIA said BMF — unlike other banks in the the British colony — continued to extend credit to real estate despite concerns of a weakening market.


Document via Central Intelligence Agency.


Document via Central Intelligence Agency.

As a result, the Malaysian bank, which was initially set up to uplift impoverished Malaysians from the ethnic Malay community, had lost US$1 billion and prompted a delayed and wide scale probe into the scandal.

In the document entitled “The Bank Bumiputra Scandal: More Trouble Ahead for Malaysia’s Mahathir?”, the CIA said although Dr Mahathir had admitted BMF’s “imprudent” practices, the government’s response to the losses incurred was “surprisingly restrained”.

The agency said Dr Mahathir had downplayed the bank’s culpability while the government’s strategy to address the issue was to contain the problem while looking for a way to bail out the bank.

The 91-year-old former prime minister, who is currently a staunch critic of the present-day government embroiled in the on-going 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, has denied any involvement with the BMF fiasco.

“I don’t steal money. The money was missing and it is the bank’s money,” Dr Mahathir told local press in May 2015.

Unlike Prime Minister Najib Razak, who acted as an adviser to the strategic investment fund 1MDB, Dr Mahathir says he did not hold any position with Bank Bumi.

“I was not the manager of the bank, neither was I its adviser.”

SEE ALSO: Former Malaysian premier Mahathir aligns with foes to oust PM Najib

Despite his repeated denials, the CIA document produced in March 1985 said “circumstantial evidence” suggested that the scandal extends into the Mahathir administration. This was because as a government-owned banking institution, Bank Bumi was closely monitored buy the both the Finance Ministry and Central Bank.

“No important decisions are made without their agreement or knowledge,” the document said.

“It is unlikely that the government was unaware of Bank Bumi’s increase on lending limits for its overseas branches to allow more funds to be channeled to Hong Kong.

“This action was taken after word of Tan’s difficulties had dried up funds from other sources,”  it said.

The agency said Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, who was Trade and Industry minister during the height of the scandal, was frequently mentioned throughout the case as the implicated BMF officials were “close associates which he helped appoint”.

Dr Mahathir, who was then widely regarded as a close confidante of Tengku Razaleigh, also had close ties with those involved, including Nawawi Mat Awin, the bank’s chairman.

“The most potential damaging aspect of the affair is the connection of Tan to officials of the United Malays National Organisation (Umno), headed by Mahathir and the dominant party on the government coalition,” the agency said.

The CIA said although there had been no direct links established between Dr Mahathir and the scandal, the political standing of his administration, which took the clean government mandate in 1981, was tainted by the “hint of association”.

“The secrecy of the government’s investigation — defended as necessary under Malaysia’s Banking Secrecy Laws — and a year’s delay after the problems surfaced in effecting any management changes at BMF have made the government suspect.

“Many businessmen and bankers believe that the government is using the six accused BMF officials as scapegoats in an effort to avoid implicating senior government officials.”

SEE ALSO: Malaysia: Political allies and rivals sign declaration for Najib’s removal

In response to Dr Mahathir’s criticisms of 1MDB, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) advisory board chairman Tunku Abdul Aziz Ibrahim had slammed the elderly statesman, saying their probes into financial scandals were currently more transparent than ever before, especially during Dr Mahathir’s tenure.

“We will, in our current climate of openness, get a lot faster to the bottom of 1MDB’s shortcomings, if indeed there are problems, than we got out of the investigations into financial and other excesses during the lost ethical years when Dr Mahathir was prime minister,” Tunku Abdul Aziz wrote in a column piece published in the New Straits Times.

Tunku Abdul Aziz pointed out that no action took place in Malaysia from the aftermath of the BMF scandal, although a committee was set up to investigate the case and recommended that criminal proceedings be taken against those involved.