Opinion: The dubious hanging of Afzal Guru
Share this on

Opinion: The dubious hanging of Afzal Guru

There have been extreme reactions to Mohammed Afzal Guru’s hanging in India. While there is anger and resentment in the Kashmir Valley, many see it as justice finally delivered. Over time Guru has conveyed and symbolized different meanings to different sets of people, despite the judiciary pronouncing him guilty.

He is simultaneously seen as a terrorist, innocent, victim of police brutality, instance of gross human rights violation, injustice, pseudo secular politics, a soft Indian state, inept handling of Kashmir and Kashmiris by New Delhi.

Many comments on social networking sites, where one presumes young Indians are most active, derive a pathological Taliban-esque pleasure in the death of Guru.

English TV channels, meanwhile, went berserk after the hanging, claiming to speak on behalf of an apparently revenge seeking, blood thirsty Indian people desperately waiting every morning for Guru to die.

Most actually worry about traffic jams. Then, there are many frustrated by Sachin Tendulkar doing a Wasim Jaffer by scoring centuries in domestic matches and failing in international ones; or Manmohan Singh refusing to speak; or Baba Ramdev talking politics instead of yoga; or LK Advani still harboring thoughts of being Prime Minister; or film critics panning the immensely entertaining Salman Khan movies; or why actresses of today are not a patch on the allure and sexiness of yesteryear beauties such as Zeenat Aman.

[READ MORE HERE: Kashmiri’s hanging leads to fears of new unrest]

The fact remains that Guru knowingly or unknowingly facilitated the 2001 brazen attack on Parliament, which nobody tires of mentioning is the symbol of Indian Democracy. The function of Parliament, of course, has been reduced to a joke by our elected representatives, who spend more time away from the August House boycotting it, rather than inside.

Debate and important legislations involve bouts of shouting, sloganeering, fighting, disruptions, gesticulating and breaking furniture paid with tax payers’ money. Given criminal antecedents, accusations of corruption and rape against so many MPs, this should not be a surprise.

MP’s salaries should be docked for every chair and mike broken. Actually, it is a wonder that they were not hanging about outside shunning the House when the 2001 attack happened. Brave security men sacrificed their lives to finally kill the terrorists who tried to enter the building.

The big question about Guru’s hanging is the timing? Why now, when he has been on death row for more than a decade, along with many others, including assassins of Rajiv Gandhi and Beant Singh, the former chief minister of Punjab?

Why is it that the two main political parties, the Congress and BJP, are agreed on Guru’s hanging, when the issue has remained sensitive and divisive for so long?

This is when politicians in this country do not even agree that rape is a crime committed by men – that it has nothing to do with vibes, clothes, diet, jeans, short skirts, hour of the day or night, hormones, disco, occasion, location, boyfriend, working or drunk women.

Clearly, there has been sinister intent in the death of Guru, unlike the hanging of Mumbai attacker Ajmal Kasab due to the clinching evidence caught on CCTV cameras. Guru was no mastermind or ideologue like a Hafiz Saeed or Masood Azhar. He was a pawn caught up and influenced by the wrong people. He tried to lead a normal life, but failed due to the lure of money.

With Indian Muslims gravitating towards supporting regional outfits in electorally crucial states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, the two national parties Congress and BJP are fighting to win Hindu and middle class votes.

The stakes have turned higher and thus politics dirtier with general elections approaching. Simplistically put, the assumption is that Hindus do not like pro-minority politics and feel happy when Muslims are put on the back foot.

The merit-driven hard-working middle class, on the other hand likes to play by the rules, dislikes indecisiveness, procrastination, and dirty politics.

A living Guru had been turned by some into another instance of government inaction, an aspect made more glaring due to failure in several other spheres – growth, economic reforms, generating employment, changes in education, checking corruption, Maoist rebellion and importantly talks with Kashmiri separatist groups.

The Congress-led New Delhi government is also alarmed by the emergence of Narendra Modi with his twin agenda of good governance and clinical development that goes down well with the middle classes.

What better way to confuse the electorate by springing Guru into collective consciousness to obliterate a bit of the Modi effect. Too many emotive issues have been played up in the past to influence and polarize voters – the politics of caste, building the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, Mandal and reservations, among others.

These are mere cloaks to cover inadequacies of performance, corruption, governance, positive change and affirmative action. Guru might have deserved to die. The timing of his hanging, however, is a charade to cloak bigger failures and pursue selfish political intents.

This article first appeared on the mockingindian blog