Amnesty International’s statement is entitled “Thailand gives ‘repressive’ 20-year sentence for text messages” and the key excerpt is:
The law overrides the Thai constitution, and according to Benjamin Zawacki, Thailand’s lese majeste law, in “its current form and usage place the country in contravention of its international legal obligations.”
The US State Department as per AP:*
Thailand is a U.S. treaty ally, and State Department spokeswoman for East Asia, Darragh Paradiso, said the United States has utmost respect for the Thai monarchy. But she said the U.S. is “troubled by recent prosecutions and court decisions that are not consistent with international standards of freedom of expression.”
BBC with a statement by the EU:
The EU said in a statement that it wanted to reiterate the importance of “the rule of law, democracy and the respect for human rights”.
“The EU urges the Thai authorities to ensure that the rule of law is applied in a non-discriminatory and proportional manner consistent with upholding basic human rights, including freedom of expression,” the statement said.
Human Rights Watch have now issued a statement which BP has reproduced below:
A Thai court’s sentencing of a 61-year-old man to 20 years in prison for sending four text messages illustrates the misuse by successive Thai governments of laws intended to protect the monarchy, Human Rights Watch said today. Thailand’s lese majeste laws should be amended to prevent unnecessary restrictions on freedom of expression.
On November 23, 2011, a Bangkok criminal court sentenced Ampon Tangnoppakul, 61, to 20 years in prison for sending four SMS messages in 2010 that were considered offensive to the Queen and the institution of the monarchy. The messages were sent to a secretary of Abhisit Vejjajiva, who was then the prime minister. Ampon was arrested by Crime Suppression Division police on August 3, 2010, after a complaint was made by Somkiat Krongwattanasuk, the secretary who received the message.
“The severity of penalties being meted out for lese majeste offenses in Thailand is shocking,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The new government seems to be responding to questions about its loyalty to the monarchy by filing countless lese majeste charges.” [BP: Not sure it is correct to say the new government is filing countless charges. At the time of the release of report there was only one]
The authorities charged Ampon under article 112 of the Penal Code, which deals with lese majeste offenses, and article 14 of the Computer Crimes Act, which broadly bars the circulation through computer systems of information and material deemed detrimental to national security, but which has also been used to prosecute cases of lese majeste.
Many other harsh punishments for lese majeste have been handed down in recent years. For example, Darunee Charnchoensilpakul, an activist, was sentenced in 2009 to 18 years in prison. Tanthawut Taweewarodomkul, webmaster of the banned Nor Por Chor USA, was sentenced to 13 years in prison in March 2011.
Since Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra took office in August, the government has led a major campaign against alleged violations of lese majeste. A “war room” was set up by the government at police headquarters in Bangkok to supervise the surveillance and crackdown on lese majeste websites. Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubamrung told the Parliament on August 26 that lese majeste “will not be allowed during this government.”
On September 1, Surapak Phuchaisaeng, a computer programmer, was arrested in Bangkok for allegedly posting pictures, audio clips, and messages deemed insulting to the royal family on the social networking site Facebook In the indictment, the public prosecutor told the court that Surapak “does not deserve mercy and should be severely punished.”
‘The defendant is Thai, living on Thai soil which has His Majesty the King as Head of State, who has shown his immeasurable graciousness to the country and its inhabitants. The defendant, apart from not recognizing His Majesty’s graciousness towards the inhabitants, has the audacity to express great malice with the intent of overthrowing the institution of the monarchy, which is worshiped by the Thai people. This is considered a threat to national security, which is unacceptable to the Thai people. The defendant’s acts do not warrant any leniency whatsoever, and he deserves harsh punishment. He committed serious crimes which threaten the security of the kingdom. If granted temporary release, he will possibly flee, or tamper with the evidence, or recommit the crimes. The public prosecutor objects to his temporary release in the event that he seeks bail.’
BP: No comment on what the prosecutor said. Now, it can be argued that the government can’t stop arrests, but this indictment has happened since the announcement by the government of a committee to review all charges. The government can’t pass the buck on this issue. Exactly what is happening with this committee?
HRW statement continues:
Minister of Information and Communications Technology Anudith Nakornthap said at a news conference, on November 24, that Thai authorities have asked Facebook to remove 26,000 URLs of user accounts in August and September and 60,000 in October and November with lese majeste contents. The ministry also warned that using “Like” or “Share” features, as well as posting comments, on an online social networking page containing content deemed lese majeste could be considered a criminal offense.
Some opposition Democrat Party members are pressuring the Yingluck government to take even more drastic measures, including blanket-blocking online social networking service providers that refuse to remove lese majeste content. [BP: Abhisit has said that the Democrat’s don’t have a policy of closing Web sites though] The United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), which led mass anti-government protests in 2009 and 2010, and supports the current government, has also pressed for the enforcement of the lese majeste laws. The UDD leadership urged their supporters to arrest anyone with lese majeste materials and hand them over to the police. In one such case, UDD security guards detained Wanchai Saetan on April 6, 2009, after they found him distributing what they considered to be anti-monarchy leaflets near a UDD protest at the Government House, the prime minister’s office. Wanchai was later sentenced to 15 years in prison, reduced to 10 years for pleading guilty.
“A chokehold on freedom of expression is being created in the name of protecting the monarchy,” Adams said.
Thailand’s King Bhumibol Adulyadej has publicly stated that he was not above criticism. In his 2005 birthday speech he said, “Actually, I must also be criticized. I am not afraid if the criticism concerns what I do wrong, because then I know. Because if you say the King cannot be criticized, it means that the King is not human. If the King can do no wrong, it is akin to looking down upon him because the King is not being treated as a human being. But the King can do wrong.”
The roots of the recent campaign appear to be found in the September 2006 military coup against Thaksin Shinawatra, the prime minister at the time, who was considered by royalists to be insufficiently loyal to the monarchy. Since then, Thai authorities have taken increasingly repressive actions against those who are critical or are perceived to be critical of the monarchy, the institution of monarchy, or members of the royal family. Actions to counter such expression have become a focus of the work of many agencies, including the army, the police, the Ministry of Justice’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI), the Ministry of Information and Communication Technology, and the Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC).
The Abhisit government led a widespread crackdown on free expression by using article 112 of the Penal Code and article 14 of the Computer Crimes Act to intimidate, arrest, and prosecute activists, journalists, and academics, both Thai and foreign. The National Human Rights Commission’s Subcommittee on Political and Civil Rights estimates that there were more than 400 lese majeste cases in 2010, nearly a threefold increase from the previous year. In a number of cases, trials were closed to the public.
Human Rights Watch urged the Thai government to make public information about everyone who has been arrested, charged, or convicted for lese majeste under article 112 of the Criminal Code and article 14 of the Computer Crimes Act. In particular, the Thai government should make available information about how many of the lese majeste complaints have been filed by private parties and how many have been filed by state agencies.
Human Rights Watch has long urged the Thai government to amend the laws so that private parties cannot bring complaints of lese majeste since no private harm is incurred. Private persons and groups often misuse lese majeste laws for political purposes. The police, courts, and local authorities often are afraid to reject allegations of lese majeste out of concern they might be accused of disloyalty to the monarchy.
“The heavy-handed enforcement of lese majeste laws has a devastating impact on freedom of expression in Thailand,” Adams said. “A broad-based discussion is urgently needed to amend the laws to ensure that they conform with Thailand’s international human rights obligations.”
BP: The HRW statement is very comprehensive and is a good summary of recent issues hence why BP has reproduced in full. Some brief comments:
1. Now, while the 20-year sentence does provide some shock factor, the reality is that no one serves that long in jail for lese majeste because they will get a pardon. If Uncle SMS serves more than 2 years in jail, BP will be surprised – it is possible he could still appeal further, but to be honest to do so is not a wise choice. If he doesn’t appeal and submits a pardon, he will be out sometime next year. If he had been sentenced to only 4 years and then served 2 years, would it have been better? Of course, the severity of the sentence is likely a factor in his inability to get bail meaning the incentive to not appeal. Hence, ending the harsh punishment may not practically solve the solution. Sending someone to jail for four SMS messages which do not threaten anyone – the only details we have about what was in the SMS is that it was not a threat and that it offended the monarchy – is the problem.
2. Some transparency over the lese majeste cases would be a good thing so we can evaluate correctly the source of lese majeste complaints.
3. So far there has been no progress under this government on the issue of lese majeste. People are being arrested, called in for questioning, and/or indicted. It is simply a continuation of the last few years as can also be seen by the upgrading of the “Internet police”. Will the red shirts speak out about this?
btw, today Joe Gordon will be sentenced. BP will have some comments on that, try to summarize some other media commentary on lese majeste, and other recent developments as time permits.