Burma’s political prisoner amnesty: How free is free?
By Zin Linn Jan 15, 2012 11:33PM UTCBurma has been pushing for an end to Western sanctions with a few remarkable changes after years of military rule. The current Burmese government has surprised rights watchers with some pro-reform moves, including talk between President Thein Sein and key opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
On Friday Burma released 302 political prisoners out of 651 released in total, including several prominent student activists of the 1988 revolt.
Such an amnesty had been long demanded by the West and the UN and it was duly hailed by the international community. The United States said that it will consider reinstating full diplomatic ties.

Min Ko Naing, center, a prominent student leader from the failed 1988 pro-democracy uprising, waves to supporters as he visits a pagoda in Pyay, Burma, Saturday. Pic: AP.
Of four recent amnesties for prisoners, the latest was easily the most significant. Although fewer prisoners were granted reprieve, the latest release which included prominent figures such as Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, Khun Tun Oo and U Gambira, a Buddhist monk who led saffron revolution in 2007.
Ex-premier and chief of military intelligence Khin Nyunt was also released this time. A number of Democratic Voice of Burma journalists were also freed.
But some political analysts criticize the government of using the previous junta’s Section 401. The military regime uses Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code as the legal mechanism for those amnesties.
Article (1) of Section 401 grants the President the power to suspend a sentence, while article (3) gives power to cancel that suspension and order re-arrest of a person at any time without a warrant, requiring that he or she must serve the remainder of the original sentence. These powers lie with the executive and not the judiciary.
The former political prisoners are constantly under watch by Military Affairs Security, generally known as Military Intelligence and their informers. The ex-political-detainees often face harassment, intimidation and arbitrary arrest. They are deprived of education and employment opportunities.
So, many 1988-generation dissidents have been calling the government to get rid of the undemocratic ruling laws including Section 401. Although the political prisoners were released under president’s amnesty, they have to face threats by the undemocratic emergency security laws.
Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, Jimmy, Htay Kywe and several 1988-generation student leaders have experienced of repeated detention without warrant for more than two to three times respectively in order to use them as bargaining chips.
The previous junta’s 2008 Constitution is a barrier to democratic transition since it cements military rule, alienates ethnic minorities and challenges human rights. It also prescribes general pardon to the former military officials. According to the article 445 of the 2008 constitution, no proceeding shall be instituted against any member of the previous military government in respect of any act done in execution of their respective duties.
Therefore, it is critically important to end impunity for violations of human rights and crimes against humanity with appropriate action from the United Nations and the international community.
On the contrary, political prisoners are still under threat of the Section 401 due to their past participation in the country’s non-violent political progression.
After releasing the political prisoners, the current government must guarantee them that they will not be rearrested by using the Section 401. It looked like the political dissidents were held as hostages by the government to bargain for the Western sanctions.
If the government is adamantly holding these unfair laws, people may not believe that it will go along the non-reversible reform path. As a result, the Western democracy governments should not be too hurried to lift the sanctions.
The situation needs to watch carefully on Burma’s reform display to become a non-reversible one, including getting rid of repressive laws.



