I actually really pity copy editors and editors in general at newspapers and other media organizations in places like Pakistan. The problem is that there is too much news every day, in a bad way.

I spent six years of my childhood in Singapore, and I remember that each murder there — if I recall correctly, there used to be between five and 10 every year — was huge news. Front page stuff. Maybe my memory is playing tricks on me, but that’s certainly the way I remember it. And I bet if the electricity goes out in Sweden, or there is a flash flood in Korea, or a terrorist attack in Australia, it would occupy the front pages of their newspapers and the front ends of their news programs on TV for many, many days.

The problem in Pakistan, in many respects, is that there is too much bad news. There’s something crappy happening every day, and people who would lead normal lives in other countries end up dying or losing their families here because of political violence or crazy bus drivers on highways or robberies gone wrong or whatever. All this is to say I appreciate greatly the difficulties in allocating newspaper inches to various episodes of tragedy. Really, I get it.

That said…

I find the reaction to the air plane crash yesterday versus the floods in KP fascinating. When the plane crash happened, it was all over the news channels and newspapers, taking up all the space available. But the floods are as serious, if not more so, than the air crash. As many people have died, and there has been significantly more damage to property and crops and so on.

But here’s the thing. It hasn’t really engendered the same level of reaction from our press and blogosphere/twitterverse. While it is the first item on the websites of both The News



…and the Express Tribune

 


…the floods enjoy less prominence in the Daily Times

 

 

…and really, really inadqeaute prominence by Dawn. In fact, I had to zoom out five times to get the headline on the floods in one window.

 

Getting to the point of the post, I would argue that class really matters here. The type of person who is likely to die in an Air Blue flight, socio-economically speaking, is very different from the type of person who loses their family in flooding in KP. I’m sorry, but that’s just the truth, and anyone pretending otherwise is just being silly.

I would further submit that that distinction matters when deciding upon the coverage given to this. Ask yourselves this: do you really think Dawn would’ve buried this story that low down if the floods took place in Karachi in Gulshan or Nazimabad, or God forbid, Defence or Clifton or KDA? (assumie that Karachi had a river running through it). For the types of people who read (and work for) English newspapers, a plane crash simply resonates more than a flood in a relatively sparely populated province, and that seriously affects how the balance is struck between the two tragedies in terms of coverage. Mind you, I’m not arguing it’s a conscious decision — I’m just saying that the ability to feel empathy for a certain type of victim really matters, even if it’s under the surface of our cognitive faculties.

Two caveats. One, there’s a lot that goes into deciding which stories get prominence, and I am not some media studies expert that I can pretend to know all those factors. Frankly, there’s something about a plane crash that makes it very, very newsworthy, irrespective of where it happens in the world. I don’t know what it is about plane crashes, but they bring a sense of gloom and dismay and sadness that few other comprable (in terms of casualties) incidents do. So I can partly understand why the air crash would beat the floods, I just don’t understand how it can beat it so easily without also accounting for the class element.

Two, I don’t want to be seen as picking on Dawn here. Frankly, the becharas are the only reliable, trustworhy, calm, sedate, relatively rational newspaper in Pakistan. They don’t plagiarize stories (all three of the other major English dailies do so, and at least two — the Daily Times and The News — do it regularly). They don’t employ 20- and 21-year old college students as op-ed writers (ahem, Daily Times and ExTrib). They don’t simply make shit up (ahem, The News). They don’t put nuclear-secret sellers on their op-ed page (ahem, The News). They don’t put xenophobic, nutty right-wing conspiracy theorists on their op-ed page either (ahem, The News). You get the picture — they’re actually worthy of respect from sane, rational people, which is a commodity at a serious premium in Pakistan’s media industry.

But it is interesting how this is playing out. I can’t speak to the electronic media, because after the events of yesterday, I think I need a break from those guys for a while, so I don’t know if they’re giving it less, as much, or more prominence than the crash. I can definitely speak to the blogosphere, and it’s most assuredly been less of a story there.

Just something to think about, I guess.

UPDATE: It would be remiss of me to not mention that the KP floods are now, indeed, the top item on Dawn’s front page.

UPDATE II: In case it’s not clear to everyone, the “20- and 21- year old” point isn’t to be taken absolutely literally. I basically meant people 25 or younger, essentially the “just got out of college” crowd. My apologies for the lack of clarity.