The following is a summary of Anek’s two of tale democracies argument* where the rural people elect the government and Bangkokians overthrow the government:

Many will read this good/bad coup as support for Anek Laothammatas’ (1996) argument that Thai democracy is a tale of two democracies: where the rural masses elect vote-buying politicians, and the urban middle class, frustrated by the corrupt and inept nature of such governments rally to bring them down by weight of social sanction, protest and persuasion (and, in this latest episode, by cheering on a ‘‘good coup’’).

Source: MICHAEL K. CONNORS  and KEVIN HEWISON, ‘Introduction: Thailand and the ‘‘Good Coup’’’, Journal of Contemporary Asia
Vol. 38, No. 1, February 2008, pp. 1-10, p4.

Now, Matichon quotes Thaksin’s brother-in-law and former PM Somchai W as stating that:

“ที่ผ่านมามีคนพูดว่า คนต่างจังหวัดตั้งรัฐบาล คนกรุงล้มรัฐบาล แต่วันนี้คนต่างจังหวัดและคนกรุงเทพฯร่วมกันล้มรัฐบาล สมัยตนเป็นนายกรัฐมนตรี นายอภิสิทธิ์เป็นหัวหน้าพรรคฝ่ายค้านมีการเรียกร้องให้ยุบสภาวัน วันละ 3 เวลา แต่ตอนนี้โดนเรียกร้องบ้างกลับไม่ฟัง”

“In the past, people said that people from the countryside formed the government and Bangkokians brought down the government, but now those from upcountry and those from Bangkok have joined together to bring down the government. When I was prime minister, Abhisit, who was then head of the opposition demanded that [I] dissolve parliament three different times of the day, but now when such demands are made of him, he doesn’t listen”

BP: Well until it happens, there can be no version of the “tale of two democracies”, but BP thought talk of this new version was interesting as it was the first time that BP had heard it.

*This is rather an elitist argument and you can see critiques of it by Federico here.